![xojo vs xamarin xojo vs xamarin](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XeXISSrIaJA/hqdefault.jpg)
- #Xojo vs xamarin android#
- #Xojo vs xamarin software#
- #Xojo vs xamarin code#
- #Xojo vs xamarin windows 7#
![xojo vs xamarin xojo vs xamarin](https://i.imgur.com/qBkZduS.png)
![xojo vs xamarin xojo vs xamarin](https://cloudsmallbusinessservice.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Mobile-App-Development-App-Creation-Software-Xamarin.pdf.png)
#Xojo vs xamarin android#
Android for smartphones and tablet computers (x86, ARM).An exception is Java, which uses an OS-independent VM to execute Java bytecode.
#Xojo vs xamarin software#
The 32-bit ARM architectures (and newer 64-bit version) is common on smartphones and tablet computers, which run Android, iOS and other mobile operating systems.Ī software platform can be either an OS or programming environment, though more commonly it is a combination of both. These machines often run one version of Microsoft Windows, though they can run other OSs including Linux, OpenBSD, NetBSD, macOS and FreeBSD. For example: x86 architecture and its variants such as IA-32 and x86-64. For example, the Java platform is a common VM platform which runs on many OSs and hardware types.Ī hardware platform can refer to an instruction set architecture. Applications can be written to depend on the features of a particular platform-either the hardware, OS, or virtual machine (VM) it runs on. There are, however, many devices such as smartphones that are also platforms. Other well-known desktop platforms are Linux/ Unix and macOS - both of which are themselves cross-platform. An example of a common platform is the Microsoft Windows OS running on the x86 architecture. This would still require Eto.Forms, or any other bootstrapper to kickstart the application, but all other navigation would go through the Awesomium rendered html.Platform can refer to the type of processor (CPU) or other hardware on which an operating system (OS) or application runs, the type of OS, or a combination of the two. It also has a different look & feel that's tied to the platform of the user - which is a good feature, but it makes it difficult to make dedicated controls to visualise status, which would be easier in html/css.Īnother route, is a mix between Eto.Forms (or something else) to bootstrap a native UI that hosts a browser in it's window that cross platform and not dependent on the locally installed browsers, such as Awesomium. net & mono).Įto.Forms is what we work with now, but is limiting in it's UI's capabilites - as sometimes it still renders differently (sizing of windows) on different platforms. In an ideal world, we'd like to use electron fully, but unfortunately I think we need platform specific logic (which now we handle in C# w/. Posted this as well on their official forum for feedback, and whether it is a good use case for electron. electron (formerly known as atom shell) looks nice, but we have no idea whether it can interop/call into/kickstart a C#/Mono application.Sending network information (which websites were visited etc.) It's in essence an exam monitor for students when they're doing an online exam in classrooms.** This "backend" includes for example the scanning & listing of process info, taking screenshots, etc.
#Xojo vs xamarin code#
In search of a one-stop cross platform UI tool/framework that can interface with the status of the backend-code, either by polling/messaging or calling into the code of the backend code.
#Xojo vs xamarin windows 7#
Writing a desktop application that needs low level access to the system (cross platform OSX, Linux, Windows 7 to 10). ORIGINAL Question: TL DR - Backend code written in C# (.Net/Mono). There is no better alternative for us to create cross platform apps for all three plyers (macOS, linux and windows). EDIT 1 9 - At the moment our choice has gone to electron in combination with EdgeJS and all the power of NodeJS and the packages/resources on npm there.